|
|
|
|
"Howard Zinn, Historian and
Optimist, 1922-2010" January
28, 2010 || dg
(via
blog dot Open Media Boston)
"No, it's not true!"
Those were my words of denial last night when I first heard Howard Zinn
had died.
There's so much to say, I'm at a loss for words. He was a hero and a
mentor and someone who helped bolster my belief that humanity is
basically good.
"I have tried hard to match my friends in their pessimism about the
world (is it just my friends?)," Howard wrote a few days after the 2004
presidential election, "but I keep encouraging people who, in spite of
all the evidence of terrible things happening everywhere, give me hope.
Especially young people, in whom the future rests."
He wore many hats and accomplished many things - historian, author,
teacher, playwright, orator, television producer - but it was his
unflappability that I hope people remember most.
In March 2008, colleague Chuck Rosina and I recorded Howard and
Professor Irene Gendzier at a symposium on empire and war at Harvard Law
School. During the question and answer period, a student criticized
Irene and Howard as "naive and impractical" for proposing an immediate
US troop withdrawal from Iraq and asking them why, after so many decades
of activism, "have groups of your persuasion accomplished so very
little?"
Howard seemed a little angry at this student's ignorance but kept his
emotions in check. "So here's what you're saying, I think, 'we haven't
changed policy, therefore we've failed, therefore there's something
wrong with what we're saying.'"
"Well, you have to examine what you're saying," Howard continued, "and
see if it's right or wrong. I examine what we're saying about withdrawal
from Iraq and I conclude we're saying the right thing. And you say, 'but
our policy hasn't changed.' And I point to the fact that any time you
look at any movement that is going on, before it succeeds, it has
failed.
And you can look at the Black people in the South after they've been
doing this and that and the other thing, and nothing has changed and you
say 'see, you must do something different; must be something wrong with
your tactics, you failed.'
No, the tactics of protest and resistance and spreading knowledge and
agitation and civil disobedience, those are the tactics that have been
used historically, and are still being used. There are no glamorous new
tactics, that are required in order to bring about change. What is
required is persistence and patience. Not the patience of passivity but
the patience of action, continued action."
Author, social critic, and comedian Barry Crimmins agreed to come on the
radio show this Sunday to help
Marc Stern and I remember and reminisce about Howard. Barry's taking
this very hard, noting that Howard was a father figure to him. Barry
also is
writing about his friend and
mentor, saying that one of Howard's most endearing features was his
voice: he could scold governments and sooth his audience at the same
time, his words always articulate and never shrill.
After a long hiatus away from the grind of the road, Barry told me he's
considering touring again, to speak-out about the issues important to
Howard and to fill some of the void that inevitably will be left by
Howard's absence.
"I have never felt so despondent over the death of an 87 year old man,"
says Barry.
Sums it up for me too.
|
|
|
|
|
"Hang In There Baby!"
January 18, 2010 || dg
(via
blog dot Open Media Boston)
Like that poster
cat hanging on for dear life, I’m going waaaay
out on a limb to make a bold prediction: Martha
Coakley will win the Senate election.
I’m not saying this is equally a sure thing as
predicting Jack E. Robinson will lose any
election in which he takes part.
But there’s a new paradigm developing in the
minds of Republicans that their guy, Scott
Brown, can turn a blue state red and I’m just
not buying it.
[By the way, please read the
editorial by OMB’s Jason Pramas who giggles
at the way Repubs have co-opted the color
traditionally associated with communists…]
Why am I prognosticating a Coakley win on
Tuesday? Because I don’t believe you base a new
paradigm on ONE poll.
Recently, a voter survey originating from
Suffolk University in Boston put Brown slightly
ahead in the race. Oh my gosh, you would have
thought the editors at all the local TV and
radio stations and networks such as CNN had lost
their minds at the exact same moment. A
collective hysteria, if you will, which gained
momentum through the bloviating of pundits
desperate for an upset to talk about.
After all, who’s going to win big money gambling
on two great teams with close odds (the Colts
and the Saints in the Super Bowl) meeting to
decide the victor when an underdog (the Jets
anybody?) can be elevated to the role of supreme
spoiler?
Secondly, much of the discussion is being driven
by television commercials for and against the
two candidates and extensively paid for by
political action groups from outside the state.
[By the way, congratulations to all the
broadcast stations on all the revenue this
election has generated for them in campaign ads.
I hope we see an increase in hiring across the
TV and radio industries.]
But short of Brown’s calling Coakley a puppet
and Coakley accusing her opponent of being
anti-choice, how much will voters remember of
all the vitriol once they step into the booth?
Very little is my guess.
And so we have the
mythology of Scott Brown, languishing in
obscurity in the Massachusetts state
legislature, rising up to slay the Kennedy
mystique (a bit of a mythology itself) and the
“in the back pocket of the Democratic machine”
state Attorney General Coakley.
Only problem with this theory of Republican
ascension is that the vast majority of voters in
MA belong to the ranks of the unenrolled; nearly
half of all registered voters in fact. And
trying to predict what they will do is like
figuring out what kind of a season Daisuke
Matsusaka will have.
It’s true that during the 1990’s and early
aughts, Massachusetts voters installed
Republican Governors and in the legislature,
overwhelmingly Democrats. Former Governor
Michael Dukakis has said he believes this
phenomenon came from voters who believed one
party should keep the other in check. But in the
aftermath of the social and economic devastation
wrought by the Cheney/Bush administration and a
Republican controlled Congress, has there been
any evidence that independents are ready to vote
for gridlock rather than maintain Democratic
control of the Senate?
Not at all…
Are people angry at and scared of double digit
unemployment, tens of thousands of foreclosures,
and cuts to education, welfare, and municipal
services of all stripes. Yes, of course. But are
they thrilled that federal stimulus money is
filtering down to cities and towns and
non-profits doing all sorts of recovery work in
neighborhoods, and that the cost, for example,
of having COBRA – the federal program that
guarantees health insurance for families of
people who lose their jobs – was slashed by two
thirds by the Obama administration and recently
extended for another 18 months?
They should be…
In this humble opinion, voters in Massachusetts
are more sophisticated than either party gives
them credit for. Citizens will remember that if
recent history teaches them anything, it’s that
members of the party of big business (the
elephants) constantly scream bloody murder about
taxes and yet gainfully accept subsidized health
benefits and all the perks that taxes provide
them: like police and fire protection.
Oh, and the two wars the Republicans have been
saying we can’t do without for the past decade.
Finally, if you
live in the Bay State, don’t forget to actually
cast a vote on Tuesday; regardless of the
weather. And don’t fall prey to the trap into
which the professional gamblers would have you
stumble: that a confident “poker” face should
cause you to fold your cards.
|
|
|
|
|
"Random Ruminations
On Radio" Sept. 25, 2009 || dg
(via
blog dot Open Media Boston)
Reporters
writing about WGBH’s bid to buy classical music WCRB Radio, turning 89.7
FM primarily into a news/talk station, and thus competing with NPR
powerhouse WBUR are missing the point.
It’s not about who wins the ratings battle; the folks at ‘GBH understand
they lost that battle a long time ago.
Earlier this year, WGBH forged a deal with WBUR to collaborate on a new
project funded for at least two years by the Corporation for Public
Corporation establishing what is being called a “Local Journalism
Center.”
According to the original call for funding proposals, station groups
will be expected to investigate and report on a particular topic, such
as the economy or immigration. CPB bigwigs consider these
collegial efforts between regional public radio stations (and TV
stations and possibly websites such as Open Media Boston) a part of a
crucial effort “to expand local news gathering and digital platform
reporting capabilities.”
To be sure, making WGBH nearly all news is an extension of this and
other initiatives that recognize the potential audience magnet that
news, talk, and public affairs formats can be.
In the Boston metropolitan area sports talk and right wing leaning talk
shows originating at WEEI-AM, WRKO-AM, WTKK-FM, and most recently WBZ-FM,
The Sports Hub, are proof positive that conventional over the air
listeners as well as internet users will flock to these sort of
broadcasts.
And while ‘BUR only reaches 4 percent of Boston area listeners according
to the Arbitron and Nielson research firms, that figure (plus their
fundraising successes) make them a flagship station within the NPR
universe.
All of which is being counted upon by WGBH management to help make their
radio station relevant again. 89.7 FM, the ratings companies tell us, is
being listened to by less than 1 percent of Boston area ears.
Which is remarkable for a station that has a 100,000 watt transmitter
and reaches New Hampshire and Connecticut on a bad day.
Further evidence that both stations will be acting like friends rather
than fiends towards each other comes from a recent internal station memo
from WBUR General Manager Paul LaCamera.
Apparently leaked to the Boston Globe, LaCamera criticizes WGBH for
“overreaching” in that station’s attempt to buy WCRB.
But he could have said much worse, and in a remarkably conciliatory
tone, points out that at one time WBUR itself was guilty of what some
have called a smug and holier than thou approach to all aspects of their
internal and external operations.
WBUR, based at Boston University, will lead the Local Journalism Center
project, along with WGBH and WFCR in Amherst and possibly other
stations. Sources tell me that WBUR has decided to pursue the
immigration angle as its two year reporting arc.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Speaking of WGBH and WBUR, I bumped into former TV and radio public news
and talk show host Christopher
Lydon on the Boston Common on Thursday.
In a rush and walking past the site of the Alan Khazei Senate Campaign
kick-off, Lydon asked when the event would start. Not soon enough to
allow him to listen a while and make his train. He politely declined an
offer to take some of my audio recordings from the event. (Always on the
look-out to make a buck and expand the network, eh David?)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
And speaking of radio, this report just in from the watchdogs at
business publication Crains New York, ""RADIO:
It Ain’t Dead Yet".
The gist, according to Nielson Research is that young people ARE
listening to music, talk and other types of programming the old
fashioned way, on traditional radio sets. If accurate, I have one thing
to say to all you new-tech aficionados and media doomsayers:
raspberries!
One caveat: Nielson is new to the world of radio ratings and this
release may be their way of getting lots of attention from station
owners and managers. According to the story in Crains, Arbitron “did not
respond to a request for comment.” |
|
|
|
|
"MA(ck) The Knife?"
All
this talk of
tagging sharks has me really creeped out.
As an Aquarius, I ought to love the water. But the image of Great Whites
leaping out of the pounding surf; sharp teeth gleaming with blood and
bits of seal entrails, has me tangled up in fear and loathing.
(I know they haven't done that off Chatham yet; I'm just can't resist
Discovery Channel and "Shark Week.")
Also, I've never gotten over the sight of Robert Shaw being consumed
toes to head by "Bruce."
But let me assure you there is deeper political meaning to all this
carnivorous fish activity.
They say "when sharks circle, there must be blood in the water." So
let's think about what's happening right now in Massachusetts.
We've lost a revered (by most people) elected official in Edward
Kennedy. And his nephew Joe has declined to run for the office. That
means it's open season on the Senate seat with representatives and
lawyers galore coming out of the woodwork. First Coakley, then Lynch,
and Brown, now possibly Capuano. (Maybe even Curt Schilling, and his
bloody sock is sure to attract other meat eaters!)
The sharks - and I refer to them as such beasts with love in my heart -
sense the blood of the Kennedys in the water and are preparing to engulf
and devour.
Over at the State House, things look fishy as well. He has a fine new
hip, but Governor Deval Patrick's approval ratings are approaching the
Marianas Trench. (Folks, that's the deepest part of the ocean!)
Carcharodon Carcharias and their toothy brethren have their sights on
Patrick's office. Tied to people's perception of President Obama as much
as he is, the Governor better hope the outcome of the health care reform
debate leaves the Democrats singing "The
Incredible Mr. Limpet" and not "Big
Eyed Fish" by the Dave Matthews Band.
And speaking of health care: all over this nation, lobbyists for the
insurance industry are salivating over tasty morsels of "we told you the
Commonwealth Connector and health insurance mandates would be too
expensive to sustain and would never hold up as models for national
reform."
Of course, the hungry fish are not all of the right flipper variety.
"People before profits" lefties from organizations across the state are
banding together like schools of piranha to take bites out of such
titanic whales as Deutsche Bank and Bank of America.
Hmmm, all of these fish tales are making me hungry. Now I just need to
find some mercury free, organically raised, Massachusetts bay harvested,
CSF approved, cod.
Or some supermarket-purchased, scroddy fish sticks. Politics has lowered
my expectations, you know. |
|
|
|
|
"We Must Have Two
Senators" August 28, 2009 || dg
(via
blog dot Open Media Boston)
Some
pundits and politicians would spin Ted Kennedy's request to change the
state law and allow Governor Deval
Patrick to choose a replacement Senator rather than hold an election in
5 months as a left wing vs. right wing affair. Or Democrat vs.
Republican.
I disagree. I think it's about "no taxation without representation."
We must have two Senators representing Massachusetts in Congress. The
issues before that much maligned legislature are too important.
So here's my prescription: the Democrats who blocked former Governor
Mitt Romney from appointing an interim Senator when John Kerry ran for
President in 2004 must apologize profusely for changing the law. They
need to hang their heads and beg forgiveness. Then they should change
the law back to the way it was and give the Governor the power to pick
someone to fill the vacant seat as long as that person agrees not to run
in the eventual election next year.
The Republicans will get their chance. (Even if they nominate Kerry
Healey). In the meantime, Massachusetts needs full representation. |
|
|
|
|
"You Can't Handle The Truth"
August 10, 2009 || dg (via
blog dot Open Media Boston)
It's
a reporter's nightmare.
A source knowingly gives you false information in order to
subvert the search for truth or hides their identity as a way of
masking less than honorable agendas and motivations.
And you publish or air that false information - usually in good
faith, because you think the source is honest - thus
perpetuating lies and misinformation.
At best, you look silly for not realizing you were "being
played."
Something like that happened to me recently.
A man on the street, who gave his name as "Phil Davis" of
Westwood, MA, agreed to speak with me briefly following a
Veterans for Peace / International Socialist Movement protest
against Egyptian attempts to stop an aid convoy from crossing
the border into Gaza. He was very angry at the protesters; in
fact anyone who would support helping the people living in Gaza,
because the elected leadership of that territory come from
Hamas. And Hamas, according to this man, (and frankly the
governments of Israel and the United States as well) is a
terrorist organization.
Now, we can debate endlessly what constitutes "terrorism:" from
the plagues bestowed upon native North Americans by European
explorers and the dropping of the atomic bomb on Nagasaki, all
the way to the Katyusha rockets fired across the Gazan and West
Bank borders towards Israel.
The point, I believe, is that in order to have an effective,
meaningful conversation about differences in political opinion
we have to trust each other.
However, "Phil Davis," rather than engendering trust acts like a
bully, and goes way beyond the point of ever engaging in
rational conversation.
"Phil Davis" it turns out, is Hillel Stavis, former owner of
Wordsworth Books in Harvard Square, an active member of the
political correctness pushing organizations CAMERA and The David
Project, and self-appointed crusader on behalf of all things
Israel.
I know this, because three sources came forward, after listening
to my recorded interview with this man (www.openmediaboston.org/node/796)
to say that "Phil" sounded just like "Hillel."
It's true, and the following video (http://tinyurl.com/mtcysy)
convinces me that it's the same person.
Why am I spending so much time on this? Because Hillel
Stavis goes from one event to another; from the Cambridge Peace
Commission one day to a Harvard lecture the next, trying to
impose "righteous" thinking on anyone with whom he disagrees.
Except, it turns out, the truth is much less important to
"Phil/Hillel" than his pro-Israel agenda. So how can anyone
believe anything he says, ever?
Sometimes, all we can hope for, in the words of Carl Bernstein,
is the "best available version of the truth." However, Hillel
and his ilk are manipulators, bending reality to fit their
political world view.
Hmmm, sounds awfully like a recent former president and
vice-president and their policy towards the truth.
If I were leading any discussion at any forum on any topic and
Hillel Stavis raised his hand to speak, I would immediately ask
him to declare his fealty to veracity; then take everything he
says with a grain of salt.
So I've got egg on my face. I got duped by a professional
sheister. But in my own defense, I did everything I promised. I
published his quotes and aired our entire conversation on the
radio.
The same integrity can't be ascribed to those who would lie and
cheat to get their way.
|
|
|
The Zen of Brick and Mortar
July 30, 2009 || dg (via
blog dot Open Media Boston)
So,
I was buying printer cartridges and paper in my local
neighborhood "mega" office store (that's sarcasm folks) the
other day, having a discussion with the store clerk about
the true meaning of "100% recycled;" offering that I enjoy
speaking to a live human I can look in the eye and with whom
I can make human contact, when she expressed the idea that
"most people don't like to come into the store to shop; they
like buying on the internet."
Setting aside the fact that the preceding is an awfully long
run-on sentence, my colleagues at Open Media Boston (and a
good chunk of the under 30 population) think I'm a Luddite
because I refuse to Facebook and Twitter. I do all my audio
editing on a computer, blog, text on my cell phone (somewhat
reluctantly - ask my wife), instant message, and post to the
website, but to some people that's not good enough.
No, I'm required to surf and search, google and bing, and
hunt down my quarry (in this case a tri-color cartridge for
an HP deskjet printer) like a leopard caught between the
cross hairs of a Browning A-Bolt. (ok, I admit, I googled
"big game hunting rifles." Hey, I never said it wasn't cool
to have a library sitting on your desk!)
Who are all these virtual people, buying notebooks,
blotters, office furniture, and paper clips, sight unseen,
off the web? Are they chained to their desks?
Or are they at best shy and at worst misanthropic; so much
so that the thought of being in proximity of other shoppers
makes them cringe like a liberal at a Republican candidate's
pledge for "no new taxes."
I have to admit: what the clerk said the other day can be
observationally verified. A new mega-chain office supply
store opened in Roslindale earlier this year, and the place
is a mausoleum. Two city blocks wide and deep, there's
hardly anyone shopping there. Not enough staff either. But
how can you blame the corporate owners for keeping the
workforce low, given the diminshing traffic of shoppers?
What this accomplishes, of course, is an ever-widening
spiral of low expectations on the part of consumers,
stressed out workers, and capitalists who continue to live
for the moment instead of thinking of the long-term
ramifications on communities.
But I digress.
What a I wanted to say is that I like going to a brick and
mortar stores with shelves and cash registers and
(hopefully) customer-service minded employees and other
citizens. I always try to engage people in conversation
especially those that look like no one has spoken to them
for ages without criticizing their work performance or the
supper they burned last night or denied them insurance money
for a pre-existing medical condition.
A little joke here, a nod of agreement between folks when
some other customer embarrasses themselves with a silly
question or complaint there...this is all missing from the
internet buying experience. Convenient sure; but totally
devoid of community.
Now don't go reminding me that I was in the store to begin
with to buy stuff to feed the computer beast.
Life, like politics in Massachusetts, is messy.
|
|
|
|
Man, it's been a long time between postings...
June 06, 2009 || dg
My only
explanation is to make note of a severe case of writer's block. Other
than that, let's just put the past behind us (but please never forget
the past) and start anew.
Stepping Up and Out... June 04,
2009 || originally posted to
Open Media Boston
Yesterday, Jeanne and
I attended a graduation-like ceremony for our son Benjamin - a junior at
Fenway High School. The event, called "Stepping Up," took place in
the Tower Auditorium at MASS College of Art. His class consists of about
70 kids so the size of the room seemed just right.
As is the tradition at this 25 year old Boston pilot school, graduating
seniors line up opposite their junior colleagues, offer a bit of advice,
and hand them a candle. It's a torch passing ritual that harkens back
thousands of years. Because modern fire codes don't allow for lit
torches in college auditoriums, the students used battery driven
candles.
The senior's advice centered mostly on "working hard" and "being
yourself." Juniors were warned to meet their senior project deadlines as
early as possible. "Uh oh," I thought, my family has turned
procrastination into an art form.
I was impressed by one student who quoted Leonard Peltier: "You don't
have to be perfect to be holy..."
For a while now, I've been impressed also by Ben's ability to maintain
his individuality and ideals in a culture that prizes - and often
demands - conformity and obedience. It's not just the mohawk and earings;
the kid has progressive values. I suppose his parents have something to
do with that.
Roots and wings. That's what we give our children. The skills to fly the
nest AND the keys to the condo, just in case.
We've also talked about not feeding him so he won't grow so big, but
it's too late. He's reached six feet tall already and can look straight
into my eyes. And when I look, I see me and my father and Ben's
grandfather in there. Weird, huh?
(Ed. Uh, that's the same person
twice. I think I meant my grandfather, not Ben's.)
Best of luck to the rest of the graduating classes and the soon to be
seniors, all of whom are going to have to re-evaluate their ties to
corporate America and its wasteful, destructive appetite.
And start behaving as though community and kinship means something more
than who's on the MySpace/FaceBook friend's list.
|
|
|
|
Shaking out the brain while getting ready for a trip to the west coast
tomorrow...
July
22, 2008 || dg
So I'm
sitting at the computer, printing business cards, and otherwise getting
my sh*t together for a trip to GRC
13 in Portland, Oregon on Wednesday. I've been told not call it
"Ore-Uh-Gone" or else the natives will know I'm from back east.
Wait a minute; I'm not STAYING there; why
should I give a flying &%#@! what they think?
I'm attending the
Grassroots Radio Conference, hosted this year by
KBOO-FM. It was held in Lowell, MA last summer. I'm a little concerned that I won't get much out of it this
year. KBOO is staffed by a lot of "new-agey" types who think if you're
male, middle aged, and white, you have a contract with the devil in your
back pocket. My attitude always has been that if you want me to be your
ally, I'll fight the good fight right alongside you, regardless of race,
class, or whether you like ELO or Stevie Wonder. Unfortunately, there
are a plethora of well meaning but misguided people in community radio
who don't perceive the destructiveness of identity politics.
But I'm looking forward to being near the
Pacific Ocean and seeing Dave Nash and his family. Dave was my roommate
in
college and he and his wife Aviva (also a Stony Brook alum) are
super nice to host me in their home for the week.
Plus
David Rovics is playing the Saturday night music showcase. I helped
set things up between David and the conference organizers, but not a
word of thanks did I hear from the K boo hoo hooers. Oh well...
I won't have access to the website this
week, so I'll blog when I come back. In the meantime, don't forget to
listen to Marc on "RADIO with a VIEW" this Sunday, 7/27 from
10am to noon. He's got a
great interview with historian and author
Susan Quinn lined up.
Totally unrelated but important
nonetheless: The folks at the Boston Globe - and by extension, the New
York Times - must stop putting unnecessary and insanely bad content on
their websites for the purpose of filling space. For example, this "ode
to Manny" is AWFUL. These two 17 year old girls do NOT deserve to be
featured anywhere on the site. And the papers should not be forcing us
to look at additional advertising. Unlike traditional newspapers (there
are only 2 dailies in Boston) there are thousands of news sites to which
we can turn. We don't need this crap. Someone should launch a "Museum
of Bad Websites..."

And as always, PLEASE AVOID the Longfellow
bridge in Boston/Cambridge!! |
|
|
|
Activists Gather in Roxbury to Block Eviction July
16, 2008 || dg
[re-printed from Open Media Boston dot org]
A
group of activists from the Jamaica
Plain based advocacy organization
City Life/Vida Urbana, and their supporters, showed up yesterday
morning to protect a single woman facing eviction from her condominium
in Roxbury.
Paula Taylor, of 76 Perrin Street, said
the response to her situation was “awesome.”
Chanting “hey hey, ho ho, greedy banks
have got to go,” about 75 activists stood in front of the three story
blue house in this Roxbury neighborhood of triple-deckers and old brick
factory buildings. Previously, the mortgage on the condo - originally
held by The Bank of New York - had been foreclosed upon by Countrywide,
Inc. That company, now owned by The Bank of America, is serving as the
bank’s agent. Countrywide faces growing criticism for its practice of
encouraging borrowers to take sub-prime loans; especially potential
homeowners ill equipped to handle market prices.
To the surprise of blockade organizers and
Ms. Taylor herself, a constable from the Suffolk County Sheriff’s office
arrived just after 10:30am and announced the eviction had been
postponed. One activist, Pamela Bush of the Four Corners Action
Coalition, said Ms. Taylor wasn’t notified of bank officials’ change of
mind until yesterday morning.
Taylor, 43 years old and a fitness
trainer, told a reporter later that morning that the constable said the
bank had ordered the eviction called off for now and that “it was a
relief to him.” Countrywide, she said, had been allowing Ms. Taylor to
stay in the home until June 30th, while a niece living there
until recently, was finishing the school term.
Taylor has lived in the condo for two
years. Before that, , she was homeless, she said.
According to Soledad Lawrence, an
organizer with City Life/Vida Urbana, Ms. Taylor faces financial
difficulties – in part, because a roommate who was helping to pay
expenses moved from the house recently – and was having problems paying
her mortgage and utilities. The housing advocate said the Bank has been
refusing to negotiate with Ms. Taylor over the possibility of paying
rent while she stays in her home.
The Boston Globe reported that Countrywide
spokesperson, Rick Simon, said it was unlikely the company would allow
Ms. Taylor to stay in the condo longer than another 30 days. He said “it
makes it much more difficult to sell a property with a tenant in it.”
But Simon also told the paper that “we have a commitment to making the
whole process as smooth and compassionate as we can.”
In the past, City Life activists have
pledged to use their bodies, risking arrest if necessary, in order to
block eviction procedures. Ms. Taylor said people have offered her
places to stay, if necessary.
In a press release issued this week, City
Life said Ms. Taylor “will leave without a fight if someone buys her
condo who wants to move in.” Fueling anger against banks and other
financial institutions nationally, is the willingness of lenders to
evict people and leave empty homes for months, possibly years, while the
housing market remains depressed.
On Monday, the U.S. Federal Reserve agreed
to new rules that would bar financial entities from making loans without
proof of a borrower’s income and savings. But the rules, the Associated
press reported, “cover only new
loans, not existing ones, so they will have little effect on the rising
tide of mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures” Furthermore, AP
reported, the rules don't go into effect until Oct. 1, 2009.
Joining the activists at the blockade in
Roxbury yesterday were Boston City Councilor Chuck Turner and former
gubernatorial candidate Grace Ross. Currently, Ross, a registered
lobbyist, is working with the Massachusetts
Coalition Against Predatory Lending to pass three related bills in
the state legislature. One would place a six month moratorium on all
foreclosures. Another would mandate that evictions be ordered only for “just
cause.”
[AUDIO: Senator
Dianne Wilkerson testifying May 13, 2008 at the State House on
behalf of the three bills…]
Steve Meacham, a City Life/Vida Urbana
Coordinator, said a home rule petition endorsing the “just cause”
approach to evictions previously had been passed unanimously by the
Boston City Council. This is a far cry he said, from last year’s 9 to 4
defeat of a measure ordering landlords to meet with their tenants and
negotiate in good faith. Meacham pointed out that the nationwide
economic crisis has worsened significantly over the past year.
The sub-prime lending crisis has become a
classic tug of war between social justice advocates, corporations, and
government regulators. Lawrence, of City Life/Vida Urbana said activists
seek a reevaluation of the housing market based on current economic
conditions. She said Bank of America Chair and CEO Kenneth Lewis has
stated “‘if borrowers can afford to pay market rates and want to stay in
their homes, we can and do work them,’ and we think that’s great. But
the market rate is not what the mortgage was. The value of homes has
dropped. And so we’ve gone to many banks and said ‘we don’t want to
modify the loan where the tenant or former owner is still paying $400,
000 or $500,000 plus for a home. Let’s look at the true appraised value
[not these exorbitant prices] and go from there.’”
With City Life’s help, Paula Taylor was
able to discover her rights vis a vis her mortgage situation, including
the right to a hearing in Boston Housing Court. But many people, she
said, including at one time herself, “don’t know how to navigate the
system, and are really scared.” |
|
|
|
Repaso de Pelicula (Film Review)
Constantine's Sword July 6, 2008 || dg
The film based on
writer and journalist James Carroll's 2001
book is part autobiography, part indictment of organized religion...
This is not a subtle film.
In writer and journalist James Carroll's
and filmmaker Oren Jacoby's documentary based on Carroll's 2001 book of
the same name, people - who throughout history have professed to know
the will of god - are malicious sons of bitches.
From depictions of the crucifixion
straight through to modern warfare and attempts to convert cadets at the
Air Force Academy, Carroll and Jacoby trace the influence of organized
Christian religion on western civilization.
They do not like what they find: thousands
of years of oppression of Jews; the crusades - with it's destruction of
Jews, Muslims, and anyone considered impious from Spain all the way to
Palestine; the Vatican's embrace of Hitler in the 1930's and virtual
silence during the Holocaust, and of course George W. Bush and his
religious justifications for the "war on terror."
And then there's Ted Haggard, the
disgraced former leader of the Colorado Springs-based megachurch
New Life Church. Carroll and Jacoby give him plenty of film time to
explain why it's anti-American to stop Christian evangelicals from
proselytizing
on the campus of the Air Force Academy, also based in Colorado.
Personally, I became ill staring up at Haggard's unctuous expression
(and those gleaming white teeth) and his disingenuous explanation about
evangelicals carrying on a "discussion" with the people they are trying
to convert.
As Carroll (a former Catholic priest and
frequent contributor to the
Op-Ed pages of the Boston Globe) points out in his role as host and
narrator, the process is hardly a discussion. Ministers from New Life -
who seem to have total access to the academy, despite denials from a
military spokesman - tell cadets they will burn in hell if they don't
join the evangelical church. They repeatedly offer the very old myth
that Jews killed Christ.
Michael Weinstein, who is Jewish and a
former lawyer in the Reagan White House, himself a graduate of the Air
Force academy, and more recently the founder of the Military Religious
Freedom
Foundation, had two sons and a daughter-in-law study and graduate
from the academy. They were constantly badgered and threatened by other
cadets and local evangelical Christians. It got so bad, that Weinstein -
a "devout" Republican - brings a
lawsuit against the US Department of Defense.
But it's not as though anything about the
historical evolution of religion in Europe and the United States has
been about having a cordial discussion. Using as his framework, a trip
that takes him from Colorado to Italy and Germany, Carroll shows us
places where people (mostly Jews) are persecuted and killed in the name
of the Church.
In fact, it was the Roman General
Constantine who discovered he could mobilize followers by
equating the power of his sword with the symbol of the cross. Ever since
marching on Rome around 324 A.D., the Catholic, and later Protestant
hierarchies (and their political minions) have consolidated power by
finding scapegoats to first demonize, then prosecute, and eventually
destroy. From the Inquisition to the Holocaust to the current crusade
against Islamic extremism, it's an eerily consistent timeline.
A crucial bit of information - explained
to us by Carroll and Jacoby and conveniently left out of Christian dogma
- is the fact that the cross wasn't used as a symbol of Christianity
until more than 300 years after the death of Christ. Before that,
natural symbols such as fish and the lamb, represented the faith.
Not until Constantine establishes the
"holy roman empire" does the cross become a tool for marketing and
advertising and of course proselytizing.
As Carroll draws his historical and
thematic circles, one question remains unanswered. Why is the Pentagon
holding hands with the evangelical church and allowing such behavior at
one of it's primary institutions? Is it simply because Bush and his
sycophants wish to get into heaven with as many converts on their resume
as possible? That's one explanation.
But I wonder, as warfare increasingly is
conducted from the skies, whether or not Bush and Cheney and Gates worry
they will lose the enthusiasm of the pilots who are responsible for the
bombing. Is religious fervor for them, just another way of establishing
an unbreakable bond to the hearts and minds of our young soldiers? These
politicians have a long memory and they haven't forgotten that the
Vietnam War turned, in part, when soldiers stopped buying the lies about
how well that conflict was going.
I hope when he publicly speaks about the
film, Carroll addresses this question.
Overall, I found "Constantine's Sword" a
deep and comprehensive documentary; expansive in its research and
insight. Carroll makes a point of telling the audience that he remains a
believer; he is not anti-Catholic. But when religious leaders become
entangled in politics, almost nothing good can come of it. As the film's
logo points out, "there's nothing holy about war!"
Constantine's Sword is playing at the
Coolidge Corner Theatre in Brookline and the
West Newton Cinema in Newton, MA.
Film website |
|
|
|
OK, seriously... I am NOT going to take the
Red Line train across the Charles River anymore!!
Jun 28, 2008 || dg
I think I know how to learn a lesson...
See you on the Green Line.
Boston Globe: "Two lanes
closed on Longfellow Bridge:
Large trucks banned from span completely" |
|
|
|
June 23, 2008
REST IN PEACE: George Carlin
(1937-2008)
http://www.georgecarlin.com/
The first LP record anyone ever gave me
was a gift from my Grandmother of Carlin's 1973 "Occupation Foole." I
was 14. My grandmother hadn't listened to the record; she just knew
Carlin from his appearances on The Tonight Show. Man, was she shocked.... And I was hooked.
George, please let us know how farts smell
in heaven...
Seriously though, George was incredibly
good at sniffing out and exposing the hypocrisy in all things social and
political.
Here's an essay you may appreciate:
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/jun2008/carl-j24.shtml
"Carlin’s passing deserves to
be noticed"
[Not all the historical facts are accurate
in the article. ("Seven Dirty Words..." for example, appeared on "Class
Clown" not "FM & AM." But the writer's focus is on Carlin's criticism of
the power structure in America, something not being openly talked about
as much by the Carlin eulogists.]
(Randy Childs
Tribute)
"GEORGE CARLIN died June 22 of a heart attack. He did not,
mind you, "pass away." Carlin's hatred for such euphemisms was a
regular feature of his comedy." |
|
|
|
Boston Globe: "Longfellow Bridge Not Safe To Walk Or Stand On!" Jun 7, 2008 || dg
I don't own a crystal ball.
When I
reminded people recently that the the Longfellow Bridge spanning
Cambridge and Boston bears dangerous similarities to a collapsed bridge
in Minnesota, I had past articles from the Globe Newspaper to fall back
on.
But the timing is kind of eerie...
Yesterday, while covering
MIT Commencement, I must have crossed that bridge a half dozen
times. And each train operator slowed to a crawl to get across. Every
time, I thought, "this is it."
Is there another convenient way across the
Charles River? I guess it will be Green Line from Lechmere to Park
Street from now on.
l l l l l l l l l l l
Driving home from Cambridge today, the
person ahead of me on Longwood Avenue became impatient and honked his
horn at a bicyclist he thought was in his way. She was "preventing" him
from making a right on red. It was rude and pushy behavior on the part
of this driver. Topping everything off, his car had a "Hilary for
President" bumper sticker.
'Nuff said... |
|
|
|
Son of Random
Ruminations
May 29, 2008 || dg
The
crash of two trolleys on the MBTA's "D" line in Newton, MA was
tragic (an operator was killed) but I think the system as a whole is
fairly safe.
What should shake riders complacency is
the idea that something like this could happen at all.
I mean, do you ever think about the human
coordination and technology it takes to keep trains from ramming into
each other and buses from backing up along city streets, on a day to
day, week to week basis?
I know I take transit safety for granted.
In spite of the fact that the
Longfellow Bridge (the one that looks like salt and pepper shakers
and spans the Charles River between Cambridge and Boston) is nearly
identical to the
I-35W Bridge that fell apart in Minneapolis last year and led to the
deaths of 13 people, not once since then have I hesitated to take the
red line from MIT to Park Street.
When the Department of Homeland Security
and MBTA officials insisted on removing trash barrels from stations and
started searching T-riders randomly during the week of the Democratic
National Nominating Convention in the summer of 2004, I scoffed at their
puny efforts to safeguard passengers.
And when grown-ups and teens take
dangerous risks such as crossing the tracks in between stations or
ducking under gates (Stephen
Garbarino, this past Sunday, May 25th;
Robert Castro, Jan. 2007; just to name a few) or engage in the
ultimate Darwinian behavior:
sunbathing on a train trestle in Maine; I scratch my head and say,
"what the hell are these people thinking?"
But the truth remains that people do
stupid things in some cases, and in others, simply lose control. And
while the managers of our local mass transportation system certainly are
not above criticism - the cost of a ride is way too high and I'm always
tempted to smash the intercom when I hear that "...if you see something,
say something" message - now might be a reasonable time to reflect on
and recognize the effort it takes to protect hundreds of thousands of
riders every day.
Next time you have the opportunity, thank
the conductor on the train you've been riding. Have a kind word or two
for the agent in the booth in your local station. (They don't have much
to do in the era of the "Charlie Card," so a few words might help them
pass the time). And give props to the guy from the cleaning service
clearing trash from the station platform.
And by all means, don't just ride the "T."
Take an active role in improving the system. Attend monthly MBTA Board
of Director's Meetings. Join the Roxbury based T-Riders Union (TRU)
or the
Association of Public Transportation, publishers of "Car Free in
Boston." Stay informed on state transportation budget issues, and
infrastructure repairs, and
radio on the "T."
With gas prices up over $4.00 per gallon
in some areas, even a $2.00 train ride will start to look pretty good. |
|
|
|
Apple Corps...
May 16, 2008 || dg
It was around 10:00pm last night, and
Jason Pramas, Suren Moodliar and I had just come from dinner in
Chinatown.
Jason wanted to visit the grand opening of
the new Apple Computer
store on Boylston Street (and grab some free t-shirts) so off
we went to participate in the extravaganza.
Following the light emanating from a huge
Apple Inc. logo on the third floor of the building like some disembodied
spirits looking for heavenly salvation, we stopped in front of the
store's main entrance. Just inside, a phalanx of very young, fresh-faced
associates wearing brightly colored t-shirts were hooting and hollering
and high five-ing customers and curiosity seekers alike.
Once through that silly ordeal, we faced a
large spiral staircase constructed from a translucent material that
reminded me of the type of glass brick used in basement windows.
Thankfully, the structure was not entirely see-through, as the
experience of walking up the stairs and looking down might have included
re-visiting my Chinese dinner.
According to a review in the Boston
Business
Journal, the store is 21,350 square feet big. Some call this
spacious; I think it's a lot of wasted space. "Green" building systems
may mitigate the need for carbon hungry heating and air conditioning but
it still felt like being inside a toy box with way too much plastic and
cardboard packaging.
Apple's products such as I-pods and slim
laptop computers take up very little space. Miniaturization is the
point, no? So why does their store need to be stadium sized?
Perhaps, it's to accommodate all the new
employees. According to BBJ, the store added 165 new jobs to the city's
economy. But I'm not sure if that takes into account the staff from
Whelan's International, a Ronkonkoma, NY (Long Island) based company
contracted by Apple to provide security and cleaning services.
For me, there was this weird and awkward
vibe in the store. On the one hand, there were busy shoppers (an
ethnically diverse but mostly upper middle class social group)
considering all sorts of electronic gadgetry and software for their
computers surrounded by the just barely-out-of-their-teens sales staff
servicing them. On the other hand, a workforce of Black and Latino
workers with dust cloths in hand constantly wiping every inch of the
abundant glass, metal and shiny plastic surfaces. With all staff wearing
t-shirts - only the color discriminating between specialists, clerks,
and cleaners - it felt like we were inside a beehive during a conference
of queen bees.
Maybe I don't attend enough openings in
the Back Bay, where I'm told, upscale retailers routinely have workers
buzzing around during fancy galas.
Apple has a reputation for being a
relatively fair place for employees. But ever vigilant for stories of
workplace tyranny, I contacted the Boston chapter of
Jobs with Justice. Jennifer Doe, an organizer there, said that she
knew of no actions against Whelan's at the moment. As far as she knew,
she added, unions such as
SEIU were not targeting the company.
But in this humble opinion, it's worth
keeping an eye on the company. Whelan's is owned by an Australian
infrastructure and facilities maintenance corporation,
Transfield Services. They specialize in outsourced jobs. An
Australian newspaper, the Herald Sun of Melbourne reported today that
Transfield stock "nose-dived almost
25 per cent
yesterday..." What does the price of stock "down under" have to do with
maintenance workers in Boston? To answer a question with a question:
where do most corporations look to trim costs when shareholders become
unhappy? (Clue: in the workforce).
Note to
Apple Inc.: Cost is everything for me. I'd love to buy a laptop, but I
can't afford one right now. All the high fives and friendly faces won't
change that. But I'm sure your customers WILL appreciate courteous and
knowledgeable customer service, recycling and other sustainable
activities, and the understanding that your company is paying living
wages to all employees regardless of whether their checks are signed by
Steve Jobs or the CEO of your contracted vendors. |
|
|
|
More Random
Ruminations
May 12, 2008 || dg
Isn't it time to get rid of the concept of
"political correctness"? You know, that remarkably stupid theory that
allows critics of various social and political ideas, such as justice and
fairness, to claim they are being oppressed for holding dissident
views...
Today, the ultimate example
of political correctness propaganda is being fomented by G-D and her Earthly minion Ben
Stein.
Here's another example of what I'm talking
about: a week ago Monday, the Boston Globe "Sidekick" section featured
an
interview with Fox News Channel, WTKK FM, and
internet personality Joe Ligotti.
He's got it all going on. Boston accent:
check. Smokes cigars: check. Contrived blue collar working class ethic
and no ability to put brain in gear before speaking: check! His shtick
includes selling himself to the world as some kind of authentic "guy
from Boston." The type of guy who in his words "has the guts to say what
everyone else is thinking."
In other words: Archie Bunker.
Hey, "All In The Family" ranks as one of
my five favorite TV shows of all time. But I don't go around sticking my
chest out, bellowing loudly, and displaying my racism, sexism, and
American triumphalism around for the world to see. Because those things
are bad.
According to media decision makers,
however, the public only wants stereotypes and shallow, easily
digestible forms of human behavior spewing from our and TV and radio
sets and computer monitors. Characters with thoughtful, sometimes
conflicted opinions about life and politics are rarely if ever seen or
heard.
Ligotti's success depends on the extent to
which media consumers can be convinced he is some kind of ombudsmen
for the little guy. You know, the guy whose job is being stolen by
immigrants; whose war is not as much fun with all those freaky,
pro-peace demonstrators running around; whose wife is somehow not as
desirable since Massachusetts starting allowing gays to marry.
But if his "political correctness" crutch
could be yanked out from underneath him, Ligotti would become just
another run of the mill, garden variety, brash, angry loudmouth. And
then he might have to take his act back to the smoke-filled living room
where he plays poker with his likeminded buddies.
[Stereotype warning: I'm not 100% sure all
loudmouthed, cigar smoking, Bush supporting Bostonians play poker.]
But then Fox TV would have to step in and
produce a reality TV series. And then we'd have to start all over again. |
|
|
|
Random
Ruminations
May 10, 2008 || dg
Driving west along Alewife Brook
Parkway recently, through an area called The
Alewife - a swath of road and shopping centers where Cambridge,
Arlington, and Watertown, MA seem to overlap - I was struck by a crazy
thought. There's this bridge, just before the Alewife Train
station on the "red line." And on one side of this bridge there are
three very large, block rectangular apartment buildings. Many people who
depend upon some form of government subsidy live in these buildings.
On the other side, built much more
recently, are a set of buildings housing luxury condominiums. I guess
you can assume many of the residents who live here earn more than the
median income for the Boston area.
The two developments literally face
each other across the bridge.
And I was just thinking that these
folk may share something important that they themselves are not self
consciously aware of.
On one side the residents live in
constant fear of losing their Section 8 Housing vouchers. On the other
side, the people live in constant fear of their businesses going into
Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.
Both have the economy and government
social policies to blame, in part, for their troubles; what economist
Paul Krugman, in his columns for the NY Times and a 2003 book, refers to
as "The Great Unraveling."
Wouldn't it be remarkable if some
enterprising activists brought these two sets of residents together to
discuss their similarities? And to start breaking down those artificial
barriers such as race and class that divide people?
There's precedent in the work of the
Boston-based "Dialogues On Ethnic and Racial Diversity"
project. And other groups I'm sure. With the Federal (and to some
degree the State) government running amok, the economy much more an
enemy than a friend these days, and the environment at a crucial tipping
point, isn't it time to set aside petty social constructs and start
seeing other citizens as colleagues and collaborators rather than some
distant people living on the other side of the bridge? |
|
|
|
Nobody pays us to do
this...
May 06, 2008 || dg
When people ask what I
"do," I tell them that I'm an independent radio producer. When their eyes
glaze over, I add "freelance journalist." When they ask "what paper do
you write for," I give up.
Proving my value to society, if you
will, is not made any easier by the fact that I walk, talk, and work
just like a real journalist but only get paid for a tiny fraction of the
audio and written stories I generate. Most of my imagination and
creativity is poured into the weekly public affairs program "RADIO
with a VIEW," which I co-produce at non-commercial college/community
radio station WMBR, Cambridge.
Because WMBR is all-volunteer and no
one gets paid... well you see where I'm going with this. Adding up all
my expenses - gasoline, AA batteries, phones, insurance, rent on my tiny studio
office, etc. - I've been paying quite a bit out of pocket over the
years, to do, or be, a radio producer.
[Mother's Day approaches, so at
this point, neglecting to mention the debt I owe to my wife Jeanne
Goodman and forgetting to recognize her enormous patience with me and my
career, would be tantamount to declaring my intent to commit suicide.]
A major challenge and one I've been
grappling with for more than 20 years, is the expectation in community
radio that people should simply "be happy to be on the radio." The idea
that they actually might be considered "workers" deserving of salary and
benefits has been anathema amongst both station managers and financial
benefactors.
Most producers, disc jockeys,
technicians, writers, copy readers, and others, are expected to
willingly join the "volunteer culture" that persists throughout
community media.
Despite many, many individual
testimonials to the stress and crushing pressure of trying to hold down
a day job (several in some cases), and change the world through
radio, this culture of "everyone else first, you last" maintains its
grip on the "industry."
There are some obvious and compelling
reasons for this. Community media would be hard-pressed to survive if
everyone was paid a living wage. In recent years for example, the
Women's Technical and Industrial Union has issued reports that estimate
it takes $54,000 to support a family of four living in Boston. That's
with no luxuries at all, such as restaurant dining and going out to
movies. It's hard to imagine (W--- or K---, insert your favorite
community station here) paying even a small staff that amount.
Funders, seeing and hearing the
passion of community and student members of these stations, have learned
over the decades that volunteerism is "the way" and the only way. I'm
not suggesting that volunteerism is a bad thing inherently; just that
there are other ways of assessing what constitutes work and fairness.
And that an evaluation of the impact on people who love what they're
doing but can't live financially in a primarily capitalistic economy,
MUST become part of the culture of non-commercial and independent media.
When asked who our heroes are, many
community radio people start by listing Amy Goodman of Democracy Now!
Over and over, I hear producers as well as listeners cite Amy's work
ethic as the pinnacle of journalistic enterprise. Believe me, I have no
doubt she works hard - she and her staff are paid salaries, as they
should! - and that she has many remarkable accomplishments to boast
about. (Disclosure: about 12 or 13 years ago, I applied for a job
as producer with Democracy Now!)
But based on interviews I've read,
her life is so completely devoted to the radio and TV versions of her
program and her book tours, it's easy to imagine Amy living within a
caged existence, devoid of pleasures found in family, recreation, and
travel outside of work.
And yet, Democracy Now! is the
standard by which me and all my colleagues in community radio are
judged and expected to meet. It is demanded of us in countless ways. I
have no problem staying up all night on the Saturday before my Sunday
morning show. But for the volunteer "wages" I get paid, I just can't
suppress the idea that I'm being exploited.
This summer, my hope is that the FCC
will rule in favor of a non-profit
organization I am helping to start a new non-commercial, educational
radio station. We're competing with five other applicants so our
prospects are somewhat mixed. But my vision includes paying workers -
content makers, technicians, support staff - a living wage. I also want
to erect a wind turbine and solar panels as a way of supporting the
environment and our business in a sustainable way.
I figure, if you can't dream big, why
dream at all. |
|
For an inspiring and lovely spin on how
to approach supporting independent radio and media producers, please
read
AIR Executive Director
Sue Schardt's essay on the website of the "Grantmakers
in Film + Electronic Media."
Other related articles:
Broadcaster Magazine || May 15, 2008
"Community
Radio Fund Launched to Support Local Grassroots Media" |
|
|
|
My response to the "Greenwash
Guerillas" Pie in the Face of Thomas Friedman Episode
April 28, 2008 || dg |
|
Today, I received an email from a group calling themselves The Greenwash
Guerillas. On Earth Day, last week (April 22) they ran
onstage where NY Times columnist Thomas Friedman was about to give a
speech and threw pies in his general direction... Their leader refers to
himself as Colonel Custard... |
|
Dear Colonel Custard:
I
have to say, that in theory, I appreciate what you are doing in terms of
uncovering hypocrisy and disingenuousness. But that was the worst
example of guerilla pie throwing I have ever seen. It embarrassed the
two of you
much more than Friedman in my opinion. In 1977, a student and
acquaintance of mine at the State University of New York at Stony Brook
threw a shaving cream pie at the university's President with much
greater effect AND got away with it.
On
the other hand, I think there needs to be a hybrid set of tactics used
by environmental and anti-war groups that lie somewhere between the
boardroom boutique politics of the major environmental organizations and
the vandalism perpetrated in the name of the
ELF.
On
April first, I covered a protest in Copley Square, Boston, where four
women locked themselves to the front door of a Bank of America branch as
a way of stopping business as usual. (In this case, the bank’s
investment in companies that build and maintain coal-fired plants.) I
wrote about the protest on Open Media Boston, the news and culture
web portal currently in development in Boston.
Passersby mostly walked away from the scene, some turning their heads at
the commotion of more than a dozen police officers using a power saw to
cut through a bicycle lock around a woman’s neck. Others yelled at the
demonstrators for disrupting their ability to withdraw money from the
ATM.
To
the extent this type of civil disobedience was
repeated throughout the country and covered by blogs, community
radio, cable access TV, as well as the commercial press, the message
will gradually seep through the collective consciousness that many
Earthlings are “mad as hell and we’re not going to take it
anymore!”
Let’s establish at least one thing however: merely videotaping a pie in
the face incident and posting same to YouTube will not be enough
to change the world. The video becomes a curiosity; an artifact for
sideshow observation like the bearded lady and the man with no arms. The
carnival atmosphere will be interrupted slightly by charges that the
gatekeepers at Google/YouTube censored the video by removing it from
their site. But its appearance on CNN.com and the Greenwash Guerilla’s
own
site will keep the merry-go-'round spinning, so to speak.
Friedman will survive this episode. He may even find the time to write
about it in his next
book. ("The Yugo and the Kumquat Tree" anyone?)
It's still unclear whether or not
the human race will survive such atrocities as war, greed, rapaciousness of the world's
resources, and global climate change.
|
|
Civil liberties lawyer, and rights
activist Harvey Silverglate weighs in: Boston Phoenix
"The Free For All" |
|
|
|
20 year old man shot and killed in
busy, bright Jamaica Plain Park
April 22, 2008 || dg
A lot was going on in Boston
yesterday. The weather was spectacular, the Red Sox finished a four game
sweep of the Texas Rangers and once again Kenyan Robert Cheruiyot won
the Marathon.
And again, gunfire erupted and a young
person was mortally wounded.

On Monday, scores of neighbors,
commuters, and school age kids on vacation, were walking and playing
along the Southwest Corridor Park in Jamaica Plain, near the Stony Brook
Orange Line station.
About 75 yards from the front entrance
of the train station, bordered by Amory and Lamartine Streets, a
basketball court was filled with young people hanging out. Just after
4:00pm, a 20 year old man was shot – in the head according to a report
on boston dot com - and the tranquility of this diverse and lively
Boston neighborhood was shattered.
On WBZ TV last night, reporter Beth
Germano identified the 20 year old man as Luis Troncoso.
Following the shooting, Troncoso was
taken to Brigham and Women’s hospital where he died. No other details
about the victim or his assailant were available immediately. State and
Boston police continued searching the park for evidence late into the
evening.
This was the second shooting in the
neighborhood in the past few days. Friday evening, two people were
wounded in an apparent drive-by shooting on Centre Street near the
Jackson Square T station.
In the interest of full disclosure, I
live in this neighborhood (about three blocks from the basketball court)
and have participated in citizen watch events with the Brookside
Neighborhood Association. My kids, 15 and 11, and their friends, play
nearby.
I feel safe comparatively, always
trying to keep in mind that families in other parts of the city have had
to keep their kids virtually locked up in their homes in order to
protect them.
We get a lot of car break-ins; a
recent spate of tire slashings along with other property damage had
people worried, but homicides are rare enough to seem part of some
distant place. But it’s worth mentioning several recent murders of local
youngsters which remain unsolved. In January, Carlos Sierra, an eighth
grader at my daughter’s middle school on Centre Street, was killed near
his home in Dorchester. In January 2007, a 13 year old sixth grader,
Luis Gerena, was shot and killed near the Jackson Square T. I’m sure
there have been other, less well publicized violent crimes in the area.
Yesterday, while waiting for State
Police officials to issue a statement to reporters, (they never did and
referred all questions to the Suffolk County District Attorney’s office)
I approached a young man who had walked close by the crime scene out of
curiosity. He declined to give his name but agreed to answer a few
questions. He predicted “a not so fun summer” as long as shootings
continued in neighborhood parks.
Asked what he thought the city should
be doing, the 15 year old said, “gun control needs to be more targeted”
in order to stop guns originating outside of Massachusetts from getting
into Boston. He said he plans on finding ways to travel outside the city
this summer in order to play basketball without the fear of violence.
According to the website of the
national organization, Mayors Against Illegal Guns (Boston Mayor Tom
Menino serves as Co-Chair), there are 30,000 gun deaths every year;
12,000 of which are homicides. According to Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
and Firearms statistics noted on the site, 60 percent of guns used in
crimes can be traced to just one percent of gun dealers. If this is the
case, it seems state and local authorities ought to be able to turn off
the tap and do exactly the type of targeted gun control mentioned by the
young teenager.
John Rosenthal, co-founder of the
Newton, MA based organization Stop Handgun Violence, says federal gun
laws must be made significantly more strict as a crucial step in
stemming the more than 80 deaths by gun Americans suffer every day.
Speaking before the Boston City
Council in July 2007, Rosenthal said “there is no common sense when it
comes to gun laws in this nation.”
“Today, the equivalent of a Columbine
and Virginia Tech massacre will take place. Eighty to ninety Americans
will die from firearms today … there are only two products not regulated
by the national Consumer Product Safety Commission: tobacco and
firearms. Firearms lead to thirty to forty thousand gun deaths a year.
If you multiply that by thirty years, that is more Americans killed by
firearms in the United States than all American servicemen and
servicewomen killed in all foreign wars combined.”
It’s not recognized officially by any
elected group of politicians, local or national, but every time someone
is shot to death on our streets, or in our parks, the domestic war
becomes a little more horrific.
On the web:
Mayors Against Illegal Guns
http://www.mayorsagainstillegalguns.org/html/home/home.shtml
Stop Handgun Violence
http://www.stophandgunviolence.com/
Suffolk County District Attorney Dan
Conley
http://www.mass.gov/dasuffolk/ |
|
|
|
Opportunity But No Motive
March 14-15, and April 19, 2008
|| dg
Thank goodness for Pacifica
Radio.
I needed the audio from the Winter Soldier hearings
last month so I browsed over to the streaming mp3
feed from Pacifica's website, connected my Marantz solid state recorder
to the computer, and left it on all day, both days. For those of us who
wanted to listen (and see) and capture the hearings, it's not as though
we had many choices.
Other than Pacifica, and The Washington Post
newspaper, and of course the website of sponsoring organization Iraq
Veterans Against the War, the hearings virtually were ignored by all
other national (and most locally based as far as I can tell), media
outlets: TV, radio, and print. Politically oriented websites from both
the left and right perspectives weighed in but most of the conventional
press chose not to report on the 2008 version of war veterans speaking
out about their experiences in Iraq, Afghanistan, and back home in the
U.S.
Most glaring, perhaps, is the New York Times: a
search of their website and archive turned up a few articles about John
Kerry and the 1971 Winter Soldier hearings, but not a word on the events at the National Labor College in Silver Spring, MD.
This particular Saturday night, while preparing for Sunday's
"RADIO with a VIEW," I did a simple internet search using Google News
and my own local "paper of record" The Boston Globe's web portal, Boston
dot com. Typing in "winter soldier" resulted in the following top
entries:
Google News: (in descending order)
Mlive.com ("Everything Michigan") -
"Reprise of Winter Soldier anti-war conference held near D.C." (AP)
Alternet.org ("The Mix is the Message") -
"Winter Soldier: America Must hear These Iraq Vet's Stories" (by Penny
Coleman)
Joplinindependent.com - "Winter Soldier 2008: Speaking Out Against War"
(by mariwinn)
MSNBC.com posting of Washington Post article "War Stories Echo an
Earlier Winter (by Steve Vogel)
AFP.com - "US Veterans Urge Soldiers to Speak Out Against Iraq War" (Agence
France-Presse)
Boston dot com:
Boston Herald Newspaper - "Testimony From
Vets in DC Fires Up Local Protesters" (by Renee Nadeau)
New England Republican (www.nerepublican.com)
website from July, 2004
Boston Phoenix Newspaper (Portland, ME edition) - "About Town" Event
Listings - "Maine Veterans Head to DC for Winter Soldier Event"
Redmassgroup.com - "Senator John Kerry Confronted About his Anti-Troops
Past"
|
|
(NOTE: 3.16.08 2:00am - there was not a single
word in the Boston Globe
Newspaper on the veteran's testimony heard this week - david)
(NOTE
update: 3.17.08 3:00pm - The Sunday Boston
Globe did cover the local showing of the hearings which took place
in Cambridge, MA. The article was located below the fold on the front
page of the Metro/Region section. I didn't have a chance to look at the
paper before running out to WMBR - david) |
|
Greg
Guma, former Editor of the Vermont-based news magazine, Toward Freedom,
as well as a former Executive Director of Pacifica Radio, points out on
his
blog that "for the most part, the mainstream media ignored the
groundbreaking event. As of March 17, CNN, FOX News, ABC News, CBS, and
MSNBC had provided no coverage."
So
calls for a more attentive fourth estate following the near lock-step
approach the media took in support of the Bush administration in the
months and days before the invasion of Iraq seem to have fallen on deaf ears (and
minds).
Or
maybe the idea of veterans telling gritty stories about America's
failings just isn't sexy enough. Any of them sleep with a prostitute (or
an intern) perhaps? Bare their privates getting out of a Humvee?
It's
a frightening thought to imagine what happens to our democracy when
nobody trusts journalists any longer. [The internet? Please. I believe a
few major sites do proper fact checking (including this one!) but a great deal
of the information found on the web is unreliable at best.]
|
|
For an
amazing take on progressive media and the people who would sow distrust
in same, please read the essay by David Rovics posted
here... |
|
But
that is exactly what's happening because people can't make heads or
tails of the media. Every day we receive messages that trumpet the fact
that the consuming public can't get enough so-called reality TV and revealing
celebrity news. And viewer ship - at least compared to serious
journalistic endeavors - bears this out.
But
the vast majority of the world's citizens never will lay eyes upon Paris
Hilton, Britney Spears, or Brad Pitt. Yet, as Senator Barack Obama
somewhat awkwardly tried to point out recently, they know that the
economy and the state of the world generally, suck. So detached from the
true meaning of their day to day lives are the news and entertainment
programs watched by most Americans, people have come to see TV, radio,
the internet, and to some degree newspapers as a world of fantasy.
Democracy requires informed citizens. Anything else results in what
Frances Moore Lappe calls "soft democracy." It's hard enough for people
- not trained from an early age in the art and science of critical
thinking, and the crucial need to consume many sources of information -
to devise informed opinions on their own. But when the media environment
is filled constantly with distracting, manipulative, and fabricated
sounds and images, the playing field tilts enormously in favor of those
who would suppress challenges to the status quo.
Such
as the government and military leaders who should have been listening to
the soldiers and veterans testifying at Winter Soldier 2. The
testimonies that very, very few people of any political or social
standing heard. |
|
|
|
Repaso de Pelicula (Film Review)
The Counterfeiters:
A nuanced and powerful portrayal of human volition ||
March 17, 2008 || dg
Discussing, debating, and yes, arguing political
points with my friends is one of my favorite pastimes. I've been known
even to change my opinion once in a while.
But I will never change my mind on the death
penalty... No one, not an individual nor a state, should have the power
of life and death over another human being.
(We can certainly debate the abortion issue. I
believe life - as a legal concept - begins somewhere in the middle of
the second trimester. And if my wife puts me on a respirator I'll kill
her.)
The Nazi's, of course, felt altogether
differently about the Jews, gays, and war prisoners they had locked up
in their concentration camps.
In Die Falscher (The Counterfeiter), the 2007
Oscar winning film by Austrian Director Stefan Ruzowitsky, the main
character, Salomon (Sally) Sarowitsch, a Russian Jew living in Berlin,
is arrested for counterfeiting and sent to a prison camp.
After suffering the tortures of a concentration
camp and constant fear of a beating or bullet from one of the German
overseers, he is taken by cattle car train to another camp;
where he is introduced to a massive counterfeiting operation run by the
same Nazi who arrested him years earlier.
(For an historical view on this real event from
the perspective of Adolf Burger, the man who wrote the memoir the film
is based upon, you can start
here).
The men in this camp; featuring soft mattresses,
better food, and fewer beatings, are forced to use their printing and
engraving expertise to create millions of English pounds and American
dollars. The money, they are told eventually, will be used to buy
supplies for the German war effort and to destroy the allies' economies
with bad currency.
And therein lies the theme that calls me to
write about this film: an exploration of free will, choice, and the
power over life and death manifest in those choices.
Sally and his fellow prisoners must meet
deadlines or die. Many of these men have family members who already have
perished in the gas chambers. They want to live but they don't wish to
help the Nazi's. Burger sabotages the printing of the dollar and as the
deadline nears to show progress or be shot, Sally must decide whether or
not to save his men by revealing Burger's actions to the Germans or
break his oath to never "squeal on a mate."
|
|
|